Skip to content

Expendables

The movie was simply incoherent. None of the characters are fleshed out or well constructed. They’re not really constructed at all. Little bits and pieces of personality are thrown in the audience face (Yin Yang’s “family”, the lucky ring, cauliflower ears, and so on) without ever returning to them or trying to weave them into the narrative. It’s as if we’re watching the story notes for lack of an actual script. There is even a scene in which one of our heroes is shot in the back and falls dramatically and not only is this never mentioned again but that same character engages in a wrestling match minutes later.

Aside from the story, or lack thereof, the action was laughable. Comically over the top sequences are reduced to honest laughs by godawful cgi blood and flames that I haven’t seen since video games had FMV sequences. The physics are all wrong, a six shot pistol somehow pumps out a dozen rounds a second, and a small combat knife can somehow instantly slice through bone. Perhaps the worst part is that it’s played entirely straight. If it were camped up a bit with a knowing grin I could have some amount of fun from the experience.

Expendables is an incoherent mess of a film that showcases the very worst in action movies.

Doubt, Indecision, & Judiciousness

Be these people either Conservatives or Socialists, Yellows or Reds, the most important thing is — and that is the point I want to stress — that all of them are right in the plain and moral sense of the word. . . I ask whether it is not possible to see in the present social conflict of the world an analogous struggle between two, three, five equally serious verities and equally generous idealisms? I think it is possible, and that is the most dramatic element in modern civilization, that a human truth is opposed to another human truth no less human, ideal against ideal, positive worth against worth no less positive, instead of the struggle being as we are so often told, one between noble truth and vile selfish error.

Karel Capek

How to Argue with Andrew Breitbart

Courtesy of Conor Friedersdorf

The Two Party System at Work

Liberals: X is an even bigger problem now. The solution Y3 is an urgent national priority.

Conservatives: The Founders would hate Y3. It’s European. In other words, socialist. Why doesn’t anyone care about how many people Mao killed?

Voters: Yeah, why doesn’t anyone care about how many people Mao killed? And Y3 is a flawed solution. On the other hand, there doesn’t seem to be any conservative alternative for addressing X. And we’re sorta worried about X.

The Two Party System at Work, Connor Fiedersdorf

Undeserved Rewards


Top Philosophy Blog
Online PhD